Ardern lost because of CGT

Or so Bernard Hickey would have us believe, anyway. Apparently she just didn’t know the numbers involved, and if she did, she would have done things completely differently. Actually I shouldn’t say “apparently”, that’s literally what he says, because to some people politics is about winning more than it is about serving the needs of the country.

Apparently it doesn’t occur to him that some people might want a capital gains tax because they do know the numbers.

Just have a look at table C21 in the Reserve Bank’s series of statistics on household wealth. It shows that household net wealth rose $520 billion between September 2008 and the March quarter of 2017. That was largely because of a $320 billion rise in the value of housing and land – none of which was taxed. Some of the rest were rises in the value of capital in businesses, which is untaxed.

It is the dirty little secret of New Zealand’s financial life. There is much more money to be made – tax free – by buying rental property funded by bank loans than by actually working in real jobs. The leveraged returns over the last two decades have increased household net worth from $427 billion in September 1999 to $1.38 trillion by March of 2017.

That is trillion with a ‘T’. That $1.38 trillion is 5.1 times GDP. The gains since National was elected in 2008 are equal to twice the GDP of the country. Over 60 percent of New Zealanders own property and they know their net worth in their bones. It’s no accident that has become a very popular site because it allows home owners to effectively check their net worth daily as their property values rise.

Read that a few times. He’s right that these are big numbers. Really big numbers.  What if someone campaigned on exactly that argument? The gains since National was elected in 2008 are equal to twice the GDP of the country. Figure out exactly how much tax your policy would create on those numbers. Put it right up next to the shortfalls National have created. Does it cover the underfunding for the DHBs that are buying tools at Mitre 10 and leaving men with prostate cancer on waiting lists until their diagnosis becomes terminal? What would it do for the amount of government money spent on emergency accommodation in hotels because there isn’t enough social housing?

Political parties and commentators sure seem to pretty much agree that voters can deal with bad news when it’s about the age of superannuation. It’s taken for granted that we can talk about raising that, when the people who most need superannuation are those who work in low income manual labour and whose life expectancy is the lowest. But apparently homeowners are so fragile we can’t possibly lay out the facts for them and point out that their tax-free gains could literally be saving lives. I guess those billions and trillions are just too big to fail, and I’m sure we all remember the last time we heard that, back in 2008.

Captain America and the Falcon

This run tied in with the whole Avengers Disassembled thing where Wanda went nuts. It did not do good things for Sam. I had to revisit this for roleplaying reasons, so…

"I took him on like he was you. He ain't you."

Sam and Steve have been tasked with bringing in the Anti-Cap, a super sailor who never even gets a name. Bad luck, kid. He’s like Steve, if Steve was in the Navy and inspired by the Oklahoma City bombing instead of WWII. Oh, and kind of nuts.

Continue reading Captain America and the Falcon

All-New All-Different Avengers

The letters page in ANAD Avengers is polarised. A lot of people are super mad that they’re changing things, like comics (and especially Marvel comics) haven’t literally always been pretty damn progressive. And this iteration of the Avengers has good stuff – a mix of the old guard (Tony Stark, Vision, Sam Wilson, and I guess Jane Foster though she’s new as an actual hero) and brand new (Miles Morales, Kamala Khan, Sam Alexander), lots of tensions, Vision being a creeper, the dynamic between Little Sam and Kamala, Big Sam and Tony trying to be Team Dads… Hell, Cap and Tony just in general have some great interactions in the way they’re not exactly BFFs and definitely disagree on a lot, but still have that long history of working together and respecting each other. Well. Mostly. Sometimes.

Continue reading All-New All-Different Avengers

Captain America #154

A look - only one - passes between them. For they are men, and more would embarrass.Look, I’m not even going to talk about how homoerotic this is. Because even if you view it as completely platonic, it’s really, really sweet. That bottom left panel! “…Which is when Steve Rogers’ breathing steadies, too.” These guys have been total bros ever since they met. And yeah, they fight a lot, Sam goes back and forth on being his partner a metric ton, he calls Steve the hell out when he’s being a dick – but ten issues later when Steve’s been kicked out of his place Sharon goes straight to Sam’s because she knows that’s where he’ll be. He’s an Avenger, he could stay at their freaking mansion, but no. He’s on a cot in Sam’s office. They need each other. They’re Cap and Falcon, as much as Cap and Bucky were Cap and Bucky.

(Also note that they’re calling each other by name here. They usually don’t when they’re in costume, even when they’re alone, especially in Sam’s case because his identity is still very secret. He calls Steve a lot of things – the generic words he uses for anyone like brother, man, etc, the obvious Cap, once even baby. Steve calls him Falcon, Falc, or sometimes imitates Sam’s slang, and guys there is seriously nothing whiter than this damn white kid saying “I dig” like he grew up in the hood. But when Steve’s desperately trying to save him he forgets all about that. They might not be saying it, but they can’t just shake that off so easily.)